fix: add unnecessary negative contrast detection to voice linting
- New lint check: 'doesn't just X. They Y' pattern (Claude rhetorical crutch) - Fixed last instance in judgment essay: 'doesn't just lose income. They lose' → 'loses the acknowledgment... The income is secondary.' - Updated voice-check skill dimension 2 with the pattern description - Updated AGENTS.md with the new check - Tightened regex to avoid false positives on legitimate 'isn't only' framing 🤖 Generated with Amplifier Co-Authored-By: Amplifier <240397093+microsoft-amplifier@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ with full awareness of what's wrong.
|
||||
- Em-dash density (>5 per post = FAIL, Claude fingerprint)
|
||||
- AI trigger words (delve, tapestry, nuanced, landscape, etc.)
|
||||
- Hedging phrases ("it's worth noting", "one might argue")
|
||||
- Unnecessary negative contrast ("doesn't just X. They Y" -- Claude crutch)
|
||||
- Filler transitions ("in conclusion", "that being said")
|
||||
- Resolution closers ("the key takeaway", "at the end of the day")
|
||||
- Missing receipts (0 links + 0 code + 0 URLs in 500+ words = WARN)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user