diff --git a/bundle.md b/bundle.md
index 383e3d6..b3dcc1c 100644
--- a/bundle.md
+++ b/bundle.md
@@ -9,4 +9,8 @@ bundle:
includes:
- bundle: git+https://github.com/kenotron-ms/amplifier-bundle-design-md@master
+
+tools:
+ - module: tool-openai-images
+ source: git+https://github.com/singh2/amplifier-module-tool-openai-images@main
---
diff --git a/src/content/posts/ai-commoditizes-features-but-judgment-compounds.md b/src/content/posts/ai-commoditizes-features-but-judgment-compounds.md
index 650130c..6b58ed1 100644
--- a/src/content/posts/ai-commoditizes-features-but-judgment-compounds.md
+++ b/src/content/posts/ai-commoditizes-features-but-judgment-compounds.md
@@ -12,6 +12,38 @@ Real professional engineers will still be needed for excellence. Not because AI
AI raises the floor dramatically. It does not flatten the ceiling.
+
+
## The Dignity Problem (Most Underappreciated)
The threat to engineers isn't only economic. When expert judgment stops being consulted, something human is lost: the social recognition that hard-won expertise deserves. A doctor who loses clinical judgment to AI loses the acknowledgment that fifteen years of intuition was worth something. The income is secondary.
@@ -58,6 +90,39 @@ The failure mode of cutting engineering judgment is **lagged**. It takes 12-18 m
This is structurally identical to cutting cybersecurity. You don't see the attacks that didn't happen.
+
+
**What could change the incentive structure:**
- Liability: if organizations faced professional accountability for AI-generated software failures the way they face accountability for accounting fraud, you'd need engineers the way you need licensed accountants
- Attributed failures: high-profile disasters clearly traced to "they fired engineers and replaced with AI"